What is the most powerful processor in the world. Lga775 most powerful processor
When choosing a processor, you need to pay attention not only to pure performance, frequency and number of cores. Don't forget about the design performance of the cooling system or TDP (Thermal Design Power).
Modern processors are no longer limited to 4 cores on board. There may be 8, 12, 16... and even more. True, such processors are already intended for professionals who need high computing power. If you are looking for a processor for gaming system, then you can limit yourself to a chip with 6 cores. For example, such as .
Currently, two well-known brands are fighting each other in the processor market - AMD and Intel. For some time, AMD remained an outsider, but the Ryzen processor line brought it back to the top of the processor Olympus, making life difficult for representatives from Intel lines. Today, these two brands fight almost on an equal footing, outpacing each other with the release of each new model.
Rating leaders in terms of price/quality ratio
Every year, the CHIP testing laboratory tests a huge number of processors. All results of our tests are presented in the form of a summary rating in. This is what we were guided by when choosing the best CPUs that satisfied the price-performance ratio. The final score, which determines the position of a particular model in the table, of course, consists of performance. But high power should cost reasonable money, so in this material we are considering just such processors.
First place: AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Despite the fact that Intel products currently occupy the leading positions in the overall ranking, chips from AMD win in terms of price/quality ratio, showing excellent results at an acceptable cost. Take, for example, our leader -. For an average of just 16,500 rubles, you get a 6-core processor based on modern Summit Ridge architecture, which offers impressive performance and high operating frequencies.
In normal operation, the frequency characteristics are at the level of 3600 MHz, but in auto-overclocking mode, when you need to “throw some wood,” the processor shows an impressive 4000 MHz. Moreover, this parameter can also be overclocked, since X-marked CPUs are designed specifically for overclocking. A TDP of 95 Watts also speaks to this.
In our test, the processor scored 3629 points in the PC Mark 8 synthetic benchmark, showing that the difference in performance with 8-core processors is not very large. But in benchmarks that give scores for multi-threading, the situation is a little different: eight-core processors noticeably take the lead, which, however, is quite expected.
Second place: Intel Core i7-8700K
Compared to the leader of our rating, the six-core one no longer seems so affordable. Its cost is significantly higher and averages about 32,000 rubles, which is almost twice the price tag of the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X. In terms of performance, it is the undisputed leader, but when assessing the price-quality ratio, it loses to its competitor from AMD.
During testing, it distinguished itself by showing the highest maximum frequency - an impressive 4700 MHz. The nominal frequency in normal operation is 3700 MHz, and now it is comparable to the competitor’s performance. But in auto-overclocking mode, the Intel Core i7-8700K simply puts other chips to shame and has no equal in this at the moment.
Please note that IntelCore i7-8700K is not only a carrier of the latest architecture Coffee Lake. The name of the processor contains the letter “K”, and this tells us about good overclocking potential. By supplying the processor with increased power, it is possible to overclock the standard frequencies of the CPU itself, as well as DDR4 RAM modules. But there is a nuance - the changed power supply makes this processor incompatible with the LGA 1151 socket. LGA 1151v2 is required.
Third place: AMD Ryzen 5 1600
In third place is another six-core AMD processor, but without the “X” marking. But the cost is even more forgiving - about 14,000 rubles. Not a processor, but a gift! True, in comparison with its older brother, this model offers standard frequencies at 3200 MHz and, if necessary, can be overclocked to 3600 MHz.
One of the differences from Intel processors lies in the absence of a graphics subsystem. If the choice of processors from the top two positions allows you to postpone the purchase of a video card, then in the case of a discrete video card is a necessity. But given the high cost of graphic cards, not everyone has the opportunity to buy this component from one salary.
Based on benchmark measurements, it lags slightly behind the faster 1600X. This is especially noticeable in the test results in PCMark 8, Cinebench R15 and PovRay 3.7 RC3. But if you do not go into comparisons and take into account the TDP of 65 Watts, we can say that the final results are very good. Let us remind you that the 1600X version has a noticeably larger parameter – 95 Watts.
Fourth place: AMD Ryzen 7 1700
And again, a representative from the AMD camp shows the best value for money. We recommend buying an 8-core monster for those who do not tolerate any compromises in games or working with resource-demanding programs. According to the results of our tests, this processor proved to be highly productive and efficient, including in multitasking mode.
Clock frequencies are slightly lower than those of the leader in the rating. 3000 MHz in normal mode and 3700 MHz in auto overclocking mode. Despite this, the processor performs very well in synthetic benchmarks and shows good results. Based on the latest, this CPU can be safely attributed to the top segment. At the same time, the cost of such a top-end processor is very affordable - about 25,000 rubles.
It is best suited for working in programs that use multi-cores - here it has no equal yet. But for gaming systems, this processor will not be the best option, since many modern games are still poorly optimized for eight-core solutions from AMD. We see best option using this processor specifically in a workstation.
Fifth place: Intel Core i7-7700K
In fifth place, AMD's expansion is diluted by another chip from Intel. It can be purchased for 25,000 rubles, if you don’t mind that it belongs to the previous Kaby Lake architecture. - a mainstream chip that focuses on performance and does not offer any innovations in comparison with new products based on Coffee Lake.
In comparison with previous CPUs, which occupy the first four lines of our chart, it offers only 4 cores and 8 threads. But the base clock frequency starts at 4200 MHz. In automatic overclocking mode, frequencies can reach 4500 MHz, which is almost comparable to the values of the 6-core Intel Core i7-8700K, which is in second place.
High clock speeds benefit performance. It shows very decent results in benchmarks, and in the PCMark 8 test it is even slightly ahead of the Intel Core i7-8700K. In the 3DMark test suites, both processors are also almost on par. And given the processor’s focus on gaming systems, we recommend buying it specifically for building gaming PCs.
Top 10 best desktop processors by price/quality ratio
1.
: 70.4
Number of cores
Maximum frequency
: 4.0 GHz
Overall rating: 70.4
Price/quality ratio: 82
2.
CPU performance (100%)
: 81.4
Number of cores
Maximum frequency
: 4.7 GHz
Overall rating: 81.4
Price/quality ratio: 80
3.
CPU performance (100%)
: 66.5
Number of cores
Maximum frequency
: 3.6 GHz
Overall rating: 66.5
Price/quality ratio: 81
4.
CPU performance (100%)
: 77.3
Number of cores
Maximum frequency
: 3.7 GHz
Overall rating: 77.3
Price/quality ratio: 79
Intel Core i9-7980XE
In this article I want to tell you about Intel's most powerful processor today for home PCs - Intel Core i9-7980X E. If a little earlier the most powerful was Intel Core i7-6950X Extreme Edition, now this 10-core processor looks pretty weak compared to the new processor with 18 cores and 36 threads!).
The new high-performance processor of the Intel Skylake-X family is made using a 14-nanometer process technology, which is an achievement in itself. After all, the current family of processors based on the Haswell-E architecture was made using a 22-nanometer process technology.
The release date of the new core i 9 line and in particular the Intel Core i9 7980 XE is spring-summer 2017. Now this 18-core unit is already on sale; in DNS (Samara) it costs 145,000 rubles. I didn’t look at other stores, but I think somewhere else it might be a little cheaper.
More advanced designs for the production of processors on silicon chips make it possible to increase the number of transistors, which in turn affects the computing power.
So, characteristics of the most powerful processor Intel Core i9-7980X E :
- Socket: LGA 2066;
- Core: Skylake-X (2017);
- Process technology: 14 nm;
- Number of cores: 18 (36 threads);
- Clock frequency: 2600 MHz (max. 4400 MHz-Turbo Boost);
- L1 cache-64 KB (per core), L2 cache- 1024 KB (per core), L3 cache-25344 KB (total);
- Instruction Set: ABM, ADX, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI1, BMI2, CLMUL, EMMX, EPT, F16C, FMA3, FPU, MMX, MPX, NX, SGX, SMM, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4 .1, SSE4.2, SSSE3, TSX;
- 64-bit instruction set support - EM64T;
- The maximum supported memory is 128 GB (DDR4);
- System bus - DMI 3.0;
- Bus bandwidth - 8 GB/s;
- Heat dissipation: 165 W;
- Number of PCI Express lanes - 44;
- Energy saving technology - Enhanced SpeedStep;
- The cost is about 130 thousand rubles.
Well then, Intel Core i9-7980X E became the first 18-core processor in IT history (probably there will be a 20-core processor soon). But the question is, are all 18 cores really needed for a home computer?
Will all 18 processor cores be used? And especially all 36 streams? As the developers themselves say, 18 cores will help you work faster in resource-intensive programs. For example, in programs for video editing, for processing media content.
But are these programs so widespread and how many people work behind them? I think most ordinary users are interested in the question of performance gains in games. Now there are a lot of gamers, people play GTA 5, Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon: Wildlands, Arma3, WOT, and for them this issue is quite relevant.
I want to assure you that This processor is NOT designed for gaming! Modern games can use a maximum of 4 cores. The remaining cores simply will not be used. You can read what kind of processors there are in general to get your bearings.
Considering the cost of this “crystal” (about 120 - 150 thousand rubles), it makes no sense to buy it for games. It will be more profitable and rational to buy a top-end 4-core processor, for example Core i7 6700 (Skylake).
The most powerful processor for PC! Therefore the processor most powerful processorIntel Core i9-7980X E designed for multithreading. That is, it is “tailored” to work with programs that can use more than 4 cores.
Gaming is one of the most resource-intensive tasks on a modern PC, and there's nothing you can do about it. Despite the fact that the main component responsible for processing graphics is the video card, the CPU also significantly affects the FPS in games. If it is not productive enough, it will become a “bottleneck”, not allowing the graphics chip to develop to its full potential. Which processor is best for gaming in 2016 will help you find out the TOP gaming CPUs.
Processor rating: requirements and selection criteria
To be considered a gaming processor, the processor must meet a single criterion: be able to run games (your Cap). However, how well it should do this depends on the price category and positioning. After all, it is already clear that the capabilities of models for 100 and 1000 dollars will be “slightly” different. It is difficult to make a rating of processors by performance in 2016, since in different tasks the models exhibit different price-to-potential ratios. This is especially true when comparing different manufacturers (Intel and AMD). Therefore, our rating of processors is kept from models in price range up to 15 thousand rubles.
TO THE TOP gaming processors 2016 included only current models that meet the following criteria:
- Connector type. The list contains processors for games that are intended for installation in motherboards on the latest sockets that are current. “Antiquity” under 1155 or FM2 was not taken into account, since such CPUs are incompatible with new boards. It only makes sense to buy them in 2016 for an upgrade, if there is no need or finances to completely change the platform.
- Possibilities. Only processors that are well suited for gaming were taken into account. No matter how good the eight-core AMD FX-8300 is in multi-threaded tasks, in games it is sometimes inferior even to the older dual-core Intel Core i3, which is why it is uninteresting in its class. Although, in general, such processors are not bad, but compared to their competitors, they do not deserve to be in the TOP.
- Price/performance ratio. More powerful does not always mean better. It often happens that for a minimal increase in productivity you have to pay a substantial amount. If the difference in performance between two CPUs reaches 5%, and in price - 20%, it is clear that the weaker option will be more effective in terms of cost-to-feature ratio.
- Related costs. Saving on a processor does not necessarily mean saving on building a PC in general. Having reduced costs in one place, you may need to overpay in another. So, when buying an AMD FX-9590, it may seem that for 15 thousand you are getting a Core i7-level processor. But don’t forget that to use this chip, you still need to buy an expensive board (while the i7 works on any compatible motherboard for 4 thousand), a more powerful power supply and a high-quality cooler. Such CPUs also have no place in the TOP gaming processors of 2016.
TOP gaming processors for different budgets
The 2016 gaming processor rating includes chips that meet the above requirements and are optimal in their class. All models are selected taking into account the most attractive ratio of price, capabilities, and costs for assembling a gaming system.
5th place: AMD A10-7850K, from 6469 rubles
The AMD A10-7850K took 5th place in the TOP gaming processors 2016. This is a quad-core processor with integrated graphics, aimed at budget gaming PCs. It is designed for boards with FM2+ socket. Processor Equipped with a quartet of Kaveri cores operating at a frequency of 3.7-4 GHz, thanks to the unlocked multiplier it can be raised (4.5 GHz is not a problem if the PC case is not stuffy, but has ventilation). The cache memory size is 4 MB. The chip also includes an integrated Radeon R7 video core.
The AMD A10-7850K is a minimal gaming solution for 2016 that deserves attention thanks to its integrated graphics. Its four cores provide normal, but not very high performance. The built-in video core, in itself, is capable of running modern games only at low and minimum settings, but in Dual Graphics mode with a discrete video card Radeon R7 240 or R7 250 it shows much more interesting results.
The main advantage of the processor, which ensured its inclusion in the rating, was the built-in graphics. Thanks to it, you can build an entry-level PC when you are short of money, and later you can also buy an inexpensive video card. However, the processor potential is not very high. If the average settings are not satisfactory and you want more, the practical ceiling of a powerful video card for it is the Radeon RX 460.
4th place: AMD FX-6300, from 5250 rubles
The AMD FX-6300 took fourth place in the 2016 ranking of gaming processors for inexpensive PCs. This six-core processor has been known for a long time; several successors were prepared for it, but none of them became significantly better. The AMD FX-6300 is designed for installation in AM3+ boards that support processor TDPs of up to 95, so it’s very good for upgrading a relatively old system to AM3/AM3+. Although the processor cores operate at a frequency of 3500 GHz, it does not have integrated graphics. The volume of cache memory is 4 MB of the second level, and another 6 MB of the third. The chip also supports overclocking, the latest revisions are good at frequencies above 4 GHz, but this requires a good cooler and a normal power supply.
The number of processor cores is a compromise among AMD processors. If 4 is not enough, and 8 is already too much (and this is too much, since a Core i5 for the same money will be best choice), then 6 is the golden mean. With such a processor, you can use a GeForce GTX 1050 Ti or Radeon RX 460 class video card to play new games at medium and high settings. It will only be able to handle anything more powerful in certain multi-core games, since the performance per core leaves much to be desired.
3rd place: Intel Pentium G4400, from 3550 rubles
The Intel Pentium G4400, like the AMD A10-7850K, is a minimal processor with enough capabilities for new toys. However, if the AMD chip takes the number of cores and integrated graphics as a bonus, then strong point Intel's brainchild is quality. It has only 2 SkyLake cores, moreover, without HyperThreading support. They operate at a frequency of 3.3 GHz; there is no Turbo mode that automatically overclocks the CPU. The cache size is 3 MB. The processor is installed in boards on socket 1151, with DDR3L or DDR4 memory. There is an integrated Intel graphics HD 510, but it’s not suitable for games, so you can’t do without a video card.
It is impossible to measure absolute computing power in games in practice, but if you believe synthetic tests, one core of the Intel Pentium G4400 is stronger than two cores of AMD. Due to this, the processor almost never loses to quad-core (and even six-core) rivals from a competing company. For World of Tanks or World of Warships, this processor is absolutely ideal as part of a budget gaming PC. After all, these games are not very friendly with multi-cores, so the Intel Pentium G4400 is superior to six- and eight-core AMD, and even fully competes with the Core i5.
The strength of the Intel Pentium G4400 is its price. For that kind of money, you won't find anything better among new components. And if you consider that motherboards based on socket 1151 with the H110 chipset are also cheap, and DDR4 memory is almost equal in price to the outdated DDR3, this CPU becomes simply a godsend for the budget-conscious player. In tandem with the processor, you can install a video card of the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti level or
Computers have entered our lives so tightly that we already consider them something elementary. But their structure cannot be called simple. Motherboard, processor, RAM, hard drives: all these are integral parts of the computer. You can’t throw away this or that detail, because they are all important. But the most important role is played by the processor. It’s not for nothing that it’s called “central”.
The role of the CPU is simply enormous. It is responsible for all calculations, which means it depends on it how quickly you will complete your tasks. This could be surfing the web, drafting a document in text editor, photo editing, moving files and much, much more. Even in games and 3D modeling, where the main load falls on the shoulders of the graphics accelerator, CPU plays a huge role, and if the “stone” is incorrectly selected, the performance of even the most powerful video card will not be fully developed.
At the moment, there are only two major processor manufacturers in the consumer market: AMD and Intel. We will talk about them in the traditional ranking.
The best inexpensive processors: budget up to 5000 rubles.
4 Intel Celeron G3900 Skylake
The most affordable Intel processor
Country: USA
Average price: 4,381 RUR
Rating (2019): 4.5
The rating opens with an extremely weak processor from the Celeron line. The G3900 model has two cores of the previous generation - Skylake, which, coupled with a frequency of 2.8 GHz, gives the lowest performance result. In synthetic tests, the processor shows a result that is approximately half that of the Core i3. But the price here is quite affordable - 4-4.5 thousand rubles. This means that this processor is perfect for assembling, for example, a simple office computer or a multimedia system for the living room. Overall, this model cannot be called bad. Still, the 14 nm process technology provides good energy efficiency, and the HD Graphics 510 graphics core is suitable for casual games.
Advantages:
- Lowest price in class
- Perfect for office PC or HTPC
Flaws:
- Does not support Hyper-Threading technology
3 AMD Athlon X4 845 Carrizo
Best price
Country:
Average price: 3,070 ₽
Rating (2019): 4.5
The processors of the Athlon line belong to the budget class, which is clearly evident from the cost of the bronze medalist. But for a little over three thousand rubles you will get a very interesting stone. There are 4 cores (2 logical cores for each physical), made using a 28 nm process technology. Thanks to this, power consumption is low, and heat dissipation is quite low for AMD - only 65 W. True, you don’t have to be particularly happy about this because the multiplier is locked - you won’t be able to overclock the processor. Another disadvantage is the lack of a built-in graphics core, which means that when assembling an office PC or multimedia system you will have to separately purchase a video card.
Advantages:
- Lowest price in class
- Great performance for the price
Flaws:
- Lack of built-in graphics core
- Unlocked multiplier
2 AMD FX-6300 Vishera
The only 6-core processor in its class
Country: USA (Produced in Malaysia, China)
Average price: 4,160 RUR
Rating (2019): 4.6
AMD's FX-6300 is the only processor in the category with six cores. Unfortunately, you can’t hope for high power in the budget class - the model is based on the 2012 Vishera core. In normal mode, the cores operate at a frequency of 3.5 GHz, but, like many AMD CPUs, it overclocks well. Yes, judging by user reviews, the performance is sufficient even for games, but there are still a lot of disadvantages.
One of the main ones is high energy consumption. Due to the use of inexpensive 32 nm process technology, AMD gets very hot and consumes a lot of electricity. We also note the lack of support for modern DDR4 RAM. Because of this, the processor can be recommended not for building a new PC, but for updating an old one without replacing the motherboard and other components.
Advantages:
- 6 cores. Perfect for performing several simple tasks at the same time.
- Good overclocking potential
- Low cost
Flaws:
- Poor energy efficiency
- Aging platform
At the moment there are only two players in the processor market - Intel and AMD. But this doesn’t make the choice any easier. To make the decision to buy a CPU from one manufacturer or another easier, we have highlighted for you several main pros and cons of the products of these companies.
| Company |
Pros |
Cons |
|
Programs and games are better optimized for Intel Lower power consumption Performance tends to be slightly better Higher cache frequencies |
Work effectively with no more than two resource-intensive tasks Higher cost When the line of processors changes, the socket also changes, which means the upgrade is more complicated |
|
|
Lower cost Better price/performance ratio Work better with 3-4 resource-intensive tasks (better multitasking) Most processors overclock well |
Higher power consumption and temperatures (not entirely true of recent Ryzen processors) Worse program optimization |
1 Intel Pentium G4600 Kaby Lake
Better performance
Country: USA
Average price: 7,450 RUR
Rating (2019): 4.7
We can recommend the good old Pentium for purchase in this category. This processor, like previous participants, is made using a 14 nm process technology, LGA1151 socket. Belongs to one of the latest generations - Kaby Lake. There are, of course, only 2 cores. They operate at a frequency of 3.6 GHz, which causes the lag behind the Core i3 by about 18-20%. But this is not much, because the price difference is twofold! In addition to the core frequency, the relatively low power is due to the small size of the L3 cache - 3071 KB.
In addition to the excellent price-performance ratio, the advantages of this CPU include the presence of a built-in Intel HD Graphics 630 graphics core, which is more than enough for comfortable use of a PC without a discrete video card.
Advantages:
- Great price for this performance
- Generation Kaby Lake
- Good integrated graphics core
The best mid-class processors: budget up to 20,000 rubles.
5 Intel Core i3-7320 Kaby Lake
The most affordable processor with integrated graphics
Country: USA
Average price: 12,340 ₽
Rating (2019): 4.6
Let's open the rating with the most affordable processor in the i-core line. It is extremely difficult to call the model excellent in terms of price/quality ratio, because the cheaper Ryzen 3 even shows slightly better results in synthetic tests. However, the model that opens the TOP 5 can be safely chosen not only for an office system, but also for a gaming computer.
There are only two physical cores, but these are modern 14 nm chips from one of the latest generations - Kaby lake. Frequency - 4100 MHz. This is a very shameful indicator. In addition, there is the possibility of overclocking. Considering the excellent energy efficiency and low heat generation - even with the supplied cooler, the temperature remains at 35-40 degrees during idle, and up to 70 degrees under load - you can safely increase the frequencies. Unlike competitors from AMD, the Core i3 has an integrated graphics core, which allows it to be used in an office system without a discrete graphics card. But keep in mind that officially it only works on Windows 10
Advantages:
- Built-in graphics core
- Overclocking capability
- Low temperatures
Flaws:
- Poor performance for the price
4 AMD Ryzen 3 1200 Summit Ridge
Best price
Country: USA (Produced in Malaysia, China)
Average price: 6,917 ₽
Rating (2019): 4.7
Ryzen 3 is a low-cost new line of AMD processors, designed to once again impose a fight on Intel. And the 1200 does the job perfectly. For 7 thousand rubles, the buyer receives a 4-core processor. Factory frequencies are low - only 3.1 GHz (in high performance mode 3.4 GHz), but the multiplier is unlocked, which means enthusiasts can easily make the “stone” a little faster.
The transition to new chips not only improved performance, but also reduced power consumption, and also reduced temperatures to acceptable values. Due to the lack of a built-in graphics chip, we can only recommend this processor for budget gaming builds. Productivity is only slightly higher than the previous participant.
Advantages:
- Unlocked multiplier
Flaws:
- No built-in graphics chip
3 Intel Core i5-7600K Kaby Lake
Great processor for gaming
Country: USA
Average price: 19,084 ₽
Rating (2019): 4.7
Let's start with the fact that the i5-7600K is by no means an outsider. Yes, in terms of performance it is somewhat worse than the mastodons that you will see below, but for most gamers it will be enough. The processor has four Kaby Lake cores operating at 3.8 GHz (in reality up to 4.0 GHz with TurboBoost). There is also a built-in graphics core - HD Graphics 630, which means you can play even demanding games at minimum settings. With a normal video card (for example, GTX 1060), the processor reveals itself completely. In most games with FullHD resolution (most gamers have these monitors) and high graphics settings, the frame rate rarely drops below 60 fps. Is anything else needed?
Advantages:
- Best price
- Enough power for most gamers
- Excellent graphics core
2 AMD Ryzen 5 1600 Summit Ridge
Best price/performance ratio
Country: USA (Produced in Malaysia, China)
Average price: 11,970 ₽
Rating (2019): 4.8
The second line of the TOP 5 mid-level processors is occupied by one of the best processors in terms of price/performance ratio. With an average cost of only 12,000 rubles, in synthetic tests Ryzen 5 is able to compete with the well-known Intel Core i7-7700K standard settings(In PassMark 12270 and 12050 points respectively). This power is due to the presence of six Summit Ridge physical cores, made using a 12 nm process technology. The clock frequency is not a record - 3.6 GHz. Overclocking is possible, but in reviews users claim that at frequencies above 4.0-4.1 GHz the processor behaves unstable and gets very hot. With factory settings, idle temperatures remain at 42-46 degrees, in games 53-57 when using a standard cooler.
Also, high performance is due to large cache volumes at all levels. The CPU supports the modern DDR4-2667 standard, which allows you to create on the basis of this processor great computers for playing at medium-high settings in FullHD.
Advantages:
- Excellent price/performance ratio
- Heats up a little
Flaws:
- Low overclocking potential
1 AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Summit Ridge
The most powerful processor in its class
Country: USA (Manufactured in Malaysia, China, China)
Average price: 17,100 RUR
Rating (2019): 4.8
As expected, the processor from the top-line Ryzen 7 has the best performance in its class. Once again, we cannot help but remember the cost - for 17 thousand rubles we get power at the level of the top-end Core i7 of previous years. The processor includes eight cores, divided into two clusters. The standard clock speed is only 3.0 GHz, Ryzen 7 is guaranteed to overclock to 3.7, and with a little luck, up to 4.1 GHz.
Like the previous representatives of the line, the leader is made using a 12 nm process technology, which allows for economical energy consumption. The situation with heat dissipation is good - in stress tests, temperatures remain at 70-75 degrees.
Advantages:
- High performance
- There is an overclocking option
- A fresh platform that will be supported for at least 4 years
The best top processors
3 Intel Core i7-7700K Kaby Lake
The most popular top processor
Average price: 29,060 ₽
Rating (2019): 4.6
More recently, the i7-7700K was the top processor in the Intel lineup. But technology is developing extremely quickly, and in 2018 it is difficult to recommend this particular chip for purchase. According to synthetic tests, the model clearly lags behind its competitors - in PassMark the CPU scores only 12 thousand points, which is comparable to modern mid-level processors. But these indicators are achieved on standard settings, when 4 physical cores operate at a frequency of 4.2 GHz, but the CPU can be easily overclocked to even higher frequencies, thereby increasing performance.
Yes, the bronze medalist lags behind its competitors, but it costs at least half as much, and given its popularity, it is quite possible to find a good used processor. Also, the high prevalence and long-standing presence on the market makes it possible to find affordable motherboard with LGA1151 socket. In general, we have an excellent basis for a powerful gaming system at a relatively low cost.
Advantages:
- Good price for this class
- High performance
- Great overclocking capabilities
- High popularity
Flaws:
- Not entirely relevant in 2018
2 Intel Core i9-7900X Skylake
The most powerful processor in the Intel line
Country: USA
Average price: 77,370 RUR
Rating (2019): 4.7
Until recently, Intel's top line was the Core i7 series. But modern realities require more and more power. If you are not familiar with solutions, pay attention to the Core i9-7900X. The processor, already at a standard clock frequency, is capable of entering the TOP 10 most powerful CPUs. For example, in PassMark the model scores almost 22 thousand points - this is twice as much as the bronze medalist of the rating. At the same time, in reviews, users talk about trouble-free overclocking to 4.2-4.5 GHz with high-quality air cooling. Temperatures do not exceed 70 degrees under load.
Such high performance is due to the use of 10 cores made using a 14 nm process technology. The model supports all the necessary modern standards and commands, which allows it to be used for any task.
Advantages:
- Highest performance
- Excellent overclocking potential
- Acceptable temperatures
Flaws:
- Very high cost
- No solder under the cap.
1 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
The leader of the rating is crazy in everything - from the price of 65 thousand rubles to the incredible performance. In terms of power in synthetic tests, the model is slightly ahead of the previous participant. Internal structure however, it differs significantly. Threadripper uses 16 (!) cores. The clock speed is comparable to the Core i9 - 3400 MHz - but the overclocking capabilities are more modest. The “stone” operates stably at a frequency of 3.9 GHz; as rates increase, the necessary stability is lost.
Such a large number of cores performs well in all tasks. But using a monster for games is not entirely reasonable - not all projects can reveal its potential. AMD will be useful for professional video editors, 3D designers, etc. - in professional software, an increase in cores gives a noticeable increase in rendering speed.
Advantages:
- Relatively low price tag
- High power
- Excellent performance in professional programs
The new 72-core Xeon Phi processor will set a new bar for chip power.
Intel experienced a slight delay, but the company assures that a new, most powerful version of their supercomputer processor will be released in early 2016.
The Xeon Phi processor, codenamed Knight Landing, features a number of technological innovations that raise the performance bar to unprecedented heights. In addition, the new product is a kind of springboard between new memory technologies and the input-output process, which was made with the groundwork for use in future desktop computers and laptops.
So far, Intel is in no hurry to disclose all the details regarding the use of Knights Landing in the first supercomputers. However, according to the US Department of Energy, the new processor will be used in Cori, a 9,300-core supercomputer that will be installed in 2016 at the National Energy Research Center in Berkeley, California.
More than 50 manufacturers will use Knights Landing processors in their systems, Intel said in an official statement.
Xeon Phi processors are currently used in the most powerful supercomputer in the world, Tianhe-2, which is installed in China. It is worth noting that Knights Landing will be the successor to the current version of the Intel superprocessor, codenamed Knights Corner, which has 61 cores.
Like its predecessors, Knights Landing will act as a coprocessor and help with complex calculations. At the same time, its architecture is completely different from GPUs like Nvidia's Tesla, although the purposes of both chips are the same.
Over the years, the tasks posed to supercomputers have undergone significant changes; now the machine’s ability to gain experience and improve independently is taking center stage. According to Intel, the company has all the innovative developments in this area.
Knights Landing will have peak double-precision performance of more than 3 teraflops, and peak single-precision performance of more than 8 teraflops. According to this indicator, Intel's new product will stand on a par with other modern graphics processors installed in supercomputers around the world.
Note that double precision is very important in peak performance, as it ensures high accuracy in floating point calculations.
Knights Landing features 16 GB MCDRAM memory that delivers five times the performance RAM DDR4 type. At the same time, Intel emphasizes that such memory will be 5 times less energy-consuming and 3 times more dense in comparison with GDDR5, which is currently equipped with graphics cards.
Intel also added a high-performance communications architecture, OmniPath, which, according to the manufacturer, will help increase the overall performance of the supercomputer. This technology will speed up data exchange between disk drives, memory, processors and other components. In the beginning this technology will be used only for supercomputers, but subsequently its use will begin in server equipment.
